Responses of human motoneurons to high-frequency stimulation of Ia afferents

This study was designed to extend to humans the findings of classical studies on anesthetized cats, which have examined the discharge of spinal motoneurons in response to high‐frequency stimulus trains delivered to Ia afferents. Experiments were conducted on the monosynaptic pathway in the flexor ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMuscle & nerve Vol. 38; no. 6; pp. 1604 - 1615
Main Authors Bawa, Parveen, Chalmers, Gordon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.12.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI10.1002/mus.21184

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study was designed to extend to humans the findings of classical studies on anesthetized cats, which have examined the discharge of spinal motoneurons in response to high‐frequency stimulus trains delivered to Ia afferents. Experiments were conducted on the monosynaptic pathway in the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and soleus muscles. Subjects maintained a rhythmic discharge of a single motor unit (SMU) in either the FCR or soleus while homonymous Ia afferents were stimulated with either a single‐ or multipulse train. An n@IPI stimulus train had n pulses (n = 2–4) and an interpulse interval (IPI) of 1–8 ms. For each condition and motor unit, surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was averaged, and peristimulus–time histograms (PSTHs) were constructed for the SMU. The magnitude of the EMG was high for IPI = 1 ms, low for IPI = 2–3 ms, and high for IPI = 4–8 ms. SMU responses showed a similar pattern, which indicated that the increased EMG response was due to the presence of multiple peaks in a PSTH. The key results indicate that: (1) a short, high‐frequency stimulus train enhances the discharge probability of a motoneuron above that observed with a single pulse; and (2) the increased motoneuron responses are significantly greater for the FCR than for the soleus muscle. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Muscle Nerve 38: 1604–1615, 2008
Bibliography:istex:7D26734D5FE2B7CEA42AAAFBD1FEA696DD2F4CAD
ark:/67375/WNG-NTXVGRLT-N
ArticleID:MUS21184
Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.21184