Anti-emetic effect of ondansetron and palonosetron in thyroidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

Palonosetron is a new potent 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonist. Although this drug is thought to be more effective in patients receiving opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), clinical data are lacking. This study compared the effects of i.v. ondansetron and palonosetron administered at the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 108; no. 3; pp. 417 - 422
Main Authors Moon, Y.E., Joo, J., Kim, J.E., Lee, Y.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2012
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-0912
1471-6771
1471-6771
DOI10.1093/bja/aer423

Cover

More Information
Summary:Palonosetron is a new potent 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonist. Although this drug is thought to be more effective in patients receiving opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), clinical data are lacking. This study compared the effects of i.v. ondansetron and palonosetron administered at the end of surgery in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk patients receiving i.v. PCA after thyroidectomy. A total of 100 female non-smoking subjects were randomly assigned into a palonosetron group or an ondansetron group. Ondansetron was given as an 8 mg bolus and 16 mg was added to the i.v. PCA mixture. In the palonosetron group, 0.075 mg was injected as a bolus only. Fentanyl-based PCA was provided for 24 h after operation. The incidence of nausea and vomiting, severity of nausea, requirement for rescue anti-emetics, and adverse effects were evaluated during 0–2 and 2–24 h. The incidence of PONV during the 24 h postoperative period was lower in the palonosetron group than in the ondansetron group (42% vs 62%, P=0.045). No differences were observed between the groups during the first 2 h. However, the incidence of nausea and vomiting and nausea severity were significantly lower in the palonosetron group than in the ondansetron group during 2–24 h. The only difference in the use of rescue anti-emetics was at 2–24 h (10% with palonosetron compared with 28% with ondansetron, P=0.02). Palonosetron is more effective than ondansetron for high-risk patients receiving fentanyl-based PCA after thyroidectomy, especially 2–24 h after surgery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0007-0912
1471-6771
1471-6771
DOI:10.1093/bja/aer423