Manual hyperinflation - Effects on respiratory parameters

Background and Purpose Manual hyperinflation (MH) of the lungs is commonly used by physiotherapists in the treatment of intubated mechanically ventilated patients with the aim of increasing alveolar oxygenation, reversing atelectasis or mobilizing pulmonary secretions. However, the efficacy of MH, u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy Vol. 5; no. 3; pp. 157 - 171
Main Authors Patman, Shane, Jenkins, Sue, Stiller, Kathy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2000
Whurr Publishers Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1358-2267
1471-2865
DOI10.1002/pri.196

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background and Purpose Manual hyperinflation (MH) of the lungs is commonly used by physiotherapists in the treatment of intubated mechanically ventilated patients with the aim of increasing alveolar oxygenation, reversing atelectasis or mobilizing pulmonary secretions. However, the efficacy of MH, used in isolation, has not been clearly established. Method This randomized, controlled trial investigated the effects of MH on lung compliance (CL), the arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FIO2) and the alveolar–arterial oxygen tension difference (A–a)PO2 in 100 medically stable, mechanically ventilated subjects who had undergone coronary artery surgery (CAS). Post‐CAS subjects were used for this study as they constitute a large, homogeneous and accessible group. Subjects were randomized to either a control group (non‐MH group) or to a treatment group (MH group) which received MH within four hours of surgery. Results After four minutes of MH there were significant improvements in CL, PaO2:FIO2 and (A–a)PO2 with values remaining above baseline measures at 60 min post‐intervention. The mean improvement in CL was 6 ml/cmH2O (approximately 15%), 56 mmHg for PaO2:FIO2 (approximately 17%) and 29 mmHg for (A–a)PO2 (approximately 17%) immediately post‐intervention. No significant changes in mean CL, PaO2:FIO2 or (A–a)PO2 were seen in the non‐MH group. Conclusions MH performed in the stable ventilated patient significantly increased CL and PaO2:FIO2 and decreased (A–a)PO2, but the clinical significance of this improvement is unclear. Further investigations are required to validate the findings of this study as well as to determine the therapeutic value of MH on patient outcome. Copyright © 2000 Whurr Publishers Ltd.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-W775P2Q2-M
ArticleID:PRI196
istex:F46A8B7FACAF57A113C538C703E23C7E112C7D21
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1358-2267
1471-2865
DOI:10.1002/pri.196