Strengthening Research that Answers Nutrition Questions of Public Health Importance: Leveraging the Experience of the USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Team

• Published in: The Journal of nutrition Vol. 152; no. 8; pp. 1823 - 1830
• Main Authors: Obbagy, Julie, Raghavan, Ramkripa, English, Laural K, Spill, Maureen K, Bahnfleth, Charlotte L, Bates, Marlana, Callahan, Emily, Cole, Natasha Chong, Güngör, Darcy, Kim, Julia H, Kingshipp, Brittany J, Nevins, Julie E H, Scinto-Madonich, Sara R, Spahn, Joanne M, Venkatramanan, Sudha, Stoody, Eve
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2022; Oxford University Press; American Institute of Nutrition
• Subjects: Diet; dietary guidance; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Literature reviews; NESR; Nutrition; Nutrition Policy; Nutrition research; Public Health; public health research; Systematic review; United States; United States Department of Agriculture; United States; CVD; NESR; RCT; STROBE-nut; CNPP; dietary guidance; systematic review; nutrition research; public health research
• ISSN: 0022-3166; 1541-6100; 1541-6100
• DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxac140

The Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team conducts nutrition- and public health–related systematic reviews and is within the USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. NESR has collaborated with scientific experts to conduct systematic reviews on nutrition and public health topics for more than a decade and is uniquely positioned to share recommendations with the research community to strengthen research quality and impact, especially the evidence base that supports public health nutrition guidance, including future editions of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Leveraging the expertise of NESR and its systematic review process resulted in the following recommendations for the research community: a) use the strongest study design feasible with sufficient sample size(s); b) enroll study participants who reflect the diversity of the population of interest and report participant characteristics; c) use valid and reliable dietary assessment methods; d) describe the interventions or exposures of interest and use standard definitions to promote consistency; e) use valid and reliable health outcome measures; f) account for variables that may impact the relationship between nutrition-related interventions or exposures and health outcomes; g) carry out studies for a sufficient duration and include repeated measures, as appropriate; and h) report all relevant information to inform accurate interpretation and evaluation of study results. Implementing these recommendations can strengthen nutrition and public health evidence and increase its utility in future public health nutrition systematic reviews. However, implementation will require additional support from the entire research community, including scientific journals and funding agencies.