Computational and Neural Evidence for Altered Fast and Slow Learning from Losses in Problem Gambling

Learning occurs across multiple timescales, with fast learning crucial for adapting to sudden environmental changes, and slow learning beneficial for extracting robust knowledge from multiple events. Here, we asked if miscalibrated fast vs slow learning can lead to maladaptive decision-making in ind...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of neuroscience Vol. 45; no. 1; p. e0080242024
Main Authors Iigaya, Kiyohito, Larsen, Tobias, Fong, Timothy, O’Doherty, John P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society for Neuroscience 01.01.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
DOI10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0080-24.2024

Cover

More Information
Summary:Learning occurs across multiple timescales, with fast learning crucial for adapting to sudden environmental changes, and slow learning beneficial for extracting robust knowledge from multiple events. Here, we asked if miscalibrated fast vs slow learning can lead to maladaptive decision-making in individuals with problem gambling. We recruited participants with problem gambling (PG; N = 20; 9 female and 11 male) and a recreational gambling control group without any symptoms associated with PG (N = 20; 10 female and 10 male) from the community in Los Angeles, CA. Participants performed a decision-making task involving reward-learning and loss-avoidance while being scanned with fMRI. Using computational model fitting, we found that individuals in the PG group showed evidence for an excessive dependence on slow timescales and a reduced reliance on fast timescales during learning. fMRI data implicated the putamen, an area associated with habit, and medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) in slow loss-value encoding, with significantly more robust encoding in medial PFC in the PG group compared to controls. The PG group also exhibited stronger loss prediction error encoding in the insular cortex. These findings suggest that individuals with PG have an impaired ability to adjust their predictions following losses, manifested by a stronger influence of slow value learning. This impairment could contribute to the behavioral inflexibility of problem gamblers, particularly the persistence in gambling behavior typically observed in those individuals after incurring loss outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
We thank Ardy Rahman for implementing the recruitment and screening of participants, Jeff Cockburn, Caroline Charpentier, Vince Man, Reza Tadayon-Nejad, and Sandy Tanwisuth for valuable discussions. This work was supported by a grant from the International Center for Responsible Gaming to JOD and TF. KI is supported by the BBRF Young Investigator Grant.
Author Contributions: K.I., T.L., T.F., and J.P.O. designed research; K.I., T.L., T.F., and J.P.O. performed research; K.I., T.L., and J.P.O. analyzed data; K.I. wrote the first draft of the paper; K.I., T.L., T.F., and J.P.O. edited the paper; K.I. and J.P.O. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0080-24.2024