Computational and Neural Evidence for Altered Fast and Slow Learning from Losses in Problem Gambling
Learning occurs across multiple timescales, with fast learning crucial for adapting to sudden environmental changes, and slow learning beneficial for extracting robust knowledge from multiple events. Here, we asked if miscalibrated fast vs slow learning can lead to maladaptive decision-making in ind...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of neuroscience Vol. 45; no. 1; p. e0080242024 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Society for Neuroscience
01.01.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0270-6474 1529-2401 1529-2401 |
DOI | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0080-24.2024 |
Cover
Summary: | Learning occurs across multiple timescales, with fast learning crucial for adapting to sudden environmental changes, and slow learning beneficial for extracting robust knowledge from multiple events. Here, we asked if miscalibrated fast vs slow learning can lead to maladaptive decision-making in individuals with problem gambling. We recruited participants with problem gambling (PG; N = 20; 9 female and 11 male) and a recreational gambling control group without any symptoms associated with PG (N = 20; 10 female and 10 male) from the community in Los Angeles, CA. Participants performed a decision-making task involving reward-learning and loss-avoidance while being scanned with fMRI. Using computational model fitting, we found that individuals in the PG group showed evidence for an excessive dependence on slow timescales and a reduced reliance on fast timescales during learning. fMRI data implicated the putamen, an area associated with habit, and medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) in slow loss-value encoding, with significantly more robust encoding in medial PFC in the PG group compared to controls. The PG group also exhibited stronger loss prediction error encoding in the insular cortex. These findings suggest that individuals with PG have an impaired ability to adjust their predictions following losses, manifested by a stronger influence of slow value learning. This impairment could contribute to the behavioral inflexibility of problem gamblers, particularly the persistence in gambling behavior typically observed in those individuals after incurring loss outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 We thank Ardy Rahman for implementing the recruitment and screening of participants, Jeff Cockburn, Caroline Charpentier, Vince Man, Reza Tadayon-Nejad, and Sandy Tanwisuth for valuable discussions. This work was supported by a grant from the International Center for Responsible Gaming to JOD and TF. KI is supported by the BBRF Young Investigator Grant. Author Contributions: K.I., T.L., T.F., and J.P.O. designed research; K.I., T.L., T.F., and J.P.O. performed research; K.I., T.L., and J.P.O. analyzed data; K.I. wrote the first draft of the paper; K.I., T.L., T.F., and J.P.O. edited the paper; K.I. and J.P.O. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0270-6474 1529-2401 1529-2401 |
DOI: | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0080-24.2024 |