Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in the genomic age

The loss of effective antimicrobials is reducing our ability to protect the global population from infectious disease. However, the field of antibiotic drug discovery and the public health monitoring of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is beginning to exploit the power of genome and metagenome sequenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences Vol. 1388; no. 1; pp. 78 - 91
Main Authors McArthur, Andrew G., Tsang, Kara K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0077-8923
1749-6632
1749-6632
DOI10.1111/nyas.13289

Cover

More Information
Summary:The loss of effective antimicrobials is reducing our ability to protect the global population from infectious disease. However, the field of antibiotic drug discovery and the public health monitoring of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is beginning to exploit the power of genome and metagenome sequencing. The creation of novel AMR bioinformatics tools and databases and their continued development will advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms and threat severity of antibiotic resistance, while simultaneously improving our ability to accurately predict and screen for antibiotic resistance genes within environmental, agricultural, and clinical settings. To do so, efforts must be focused toward exploiting the advancements of genome sequencing and information technology. Currently, AMR bioinformatics software and databases reflect different scopes and functions, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. A review of the available tools reveals common approaches and reference data but also reveals gaps in our curated data, models, algorithms, and data‐sharing tools that must be addressed to conquer the limitations and areas of unmet need within the AMR research field before DNA sequencing can be fully exploited for AMR surveillance and improved clinical outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0077-8923
1749-6632
1749-6632
DOI:10.1111/nyas.13289