Predicting long-term functional limitations among back pain patients in primary care settings

To identify predictors of back-related long-term functional limitations, 1213 adult enrollees of a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) in Washington state were interviewed about a month after a consultation for back pain in a primary care setting in 1989–1990, and followed each year thereafter. Ou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical epidemiology Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 31 - 43
Main Authors Dionne, Clermont E., Koepsell, Thomas D., Von Korff, Michael, Deyo, Richard A., Barlow, William E., Checkoway, Harvey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 1997
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00313-7

Cover

More Information
Summary:To identify predictors of back-related long-term functional limitations, 1213 adult enrollees of a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) in Washington state were interviewed about a month after a consultation for back pain in a primary care setting in 1989–1990, and followed each year thereafter. Out of 100 factors documented at the one-month assessment, measures of somatization, depression, functional limitations, and pain were the strongest predictors of two-year modified Roland-Morris score among a random subsample of 569 subjects. A multiple regression model containing the Symptom Checklist Depression and Somatization scores, the one-month modified Roland-Morris score and the number of pain days in the past six months explained about 30% of the variance in the outcome. Using recursive partitioning, a very simple model was developed to identify patients at high risk of sustaining long-term significant functional limitations. The regression model and the recursive partitioning model were successfully tested in a fresh sample of patients ( n = 644). Clinical application of the recursive partitioning model and methodological aspects of this study are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00313-7