Novel bleeding risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants

Objective Balancing bleeding risk and stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common challenge. Though several bleeding risk scores exist, most have not included patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed at developing a novel bleeding risk score for patients with AF...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 931 - 940
Main Authors Adam, Luise, Feller, Martin, Syrogiannouli, Lamprini, Del‐Giovane, Cinzia, Donzé, Jacques, Baumgartner, Christine, Segna, Daniel, Floriani, Carmen, Roten, Laurent, Fischer, Urs, Aeschbacher, Stefanie, Moschovitis, Giorgio, Schläpfer, Jürg, Shah, Dipen, Amman, Peter, Kobza, Richard, Schwenkglenks, Matthias, Kühne, Michael, Bonati, Leo H., Beer, Jürg, Osswald, Stefan, Conen, David, Aujesky, Drahomir, Rodondi, Nicolas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Limited 01.04.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI10.1111/jth.15251

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective Balancing bleeding risk and stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common challenge. Though several bleeding risk scores exist, most have not included patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed at developing a novel bleeding risk score for patients with AF on oral anticoagulants (OAC) including both vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and DOACs. Methods We included patients with AF on OACs from a prospective multicenter cohort study in Switzerland (SWISS‐AF). The outcome was time to first bleeding. Bleeding events were defined as major or clinically relevant non‐major bleeding. We used backward elimination to identify bleeding risk variables. We derived the score using a point score system based on the β‐coefficients from the multivariable model. We used the Brier score for model calibration (<0.25 indicating good calibration), and Harrel's c‐statistics for model discrimination. Results We included 2147 patients with AF on OAC (72.5% male, mean age 73.4 ± 8.2 years), of whom 1209 (56.3%) took DOACs. After a follow‐up of 4.4 years, a total of 255 (11.9%) bleeding events occurred. After backward elimination, age > 75 years, history of cancer, prior major hemorrhage, and arterial hypertension remained in the final prediction model. The Brier score was 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.27), the c‐statistic at 12 months was 0.71 (95% CI 0.63–0.80). Conclusion In this prospective cohort study of AF patients and predominantly DOAC users, we successfully derived a bleeding risk prediction model with good calibration and discrimination.
Bibliography:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02105844.
Manuscript handled by: Sabine Eichinger
Final decision: Sabine Eichinger, 12 January 2020.
Funding Information
This study is funded by the Swiss Heart Foundation (grant to Prof. Rodondi). The Swiss‐AF cohort study is supported by grants of the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant numbers 33CS30_148474 and 33CS30_177520).
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI:10.1111/jth.15251