Germanic diminutives: a case study of a gap in Norwegian

It is well known that German and Dutch have productive diminutive morphology. What is much less discussed is the fact that several other Germanic languages do not have such productive morphology, notably the Scandinavian languages. Instead, these languages form compounds to express a diminutive mean...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of comparative Germanic linguistics Vol. 26; no. 1
Main Authors Alexiadou, Artemis, Lohndal, Terje
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.12.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Nature
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1383-4924
1572-8552
1572-8552
DOI10.1007/s10828-023-09141-7

Cover

More Information
Summary:It is well known that German and Dutch have productive diminutive morphology. What is much less discussed is the fact that several other Germanic languages do not have such productive morphology, notably the Scandinavian languages. Instead, these languages form compounds to express a diminutive meaning. This paper addresses the puzzle of why the Scandinavian languages do not have productive diminutive morphology. The paper argues that the culprit is the particular definite suffix that the Scandinavian languages have. This is a postnominal definite suffix that occupies a low position in the nominal functional spine. It is argued that the presence of this suffixed article accounts for the lack of productive synthetic diminutive formation in these languages.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics
ISSN:1383-4924
1572-8552
1572-8552
DOI:10.1007/s10828-023-09141-7