Behavioral dynamic portfolio selection with S-shaped utility and epsilon-contaminations
Inspired by the classical cumulative prospect theory (CPT), we propose a CPT-like functional characterized by the modeling of uncertainty on gains and losses through two epsilon-contaminations of a reference probability measure. Such functional is used to perform a dynamic portfolio selection in a f...
Saved in:
| Published in | European journal of operational research Vol. 325; no. 3; pp. 500 - 515 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Elsevier B.V
16.09.2025
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0377-2217 1872-6860 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.03.029 |
Cover
| Summary: | Inspired by the classical cumulative prospect theory (CPT), we propose a CPT-like functional characterized by the modeling of uncertainty on gains and losses through two epsilon-contaminations of a reference probability measure. Such functional is used to perform a dynamic portfolio selection in a finite horizon binomial market model, reducing it to an iterative search problem over the set of optimal solutions of a family of pairs of non-linear optimization problems on the final wealth. Despite the computational hardness of the resulting pairs of problems, epsilon-contaminations allow to represent each solution in terms of the partition generated by the stock price random variable at maturity, obtaining a sensible reduction of variables and constraints. In turn, the optimization task can be reduced to the maximization of a real-valued function of one real variable, revealing the possible ill-posedness of the problem. The resulting model is discussed by means of some paradigmatic examples on market data and a sensitivity analysis.
•Modeling ambiguity on gains and losses via epsilon-contaminations.•Optimal dynamic portfolio selection as maximization of a CPT-like functional.•Hardness and ill-posedness of the problem and variable-constraint reduction.•Examples of agent behaviors and sensitivity analysis of ambiguity thresholds. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0377-2217 1872-6860 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.03.029 |