Use of a Novel Artificial Intelligence System Leads to the Detection of Significantly Higher Number of Adenomas During Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Results From a Large, Prospective, US Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION:Adenoma per colonoscopy (APC) has recently been proposed as a quality measure for colonoscopy. We evaluated the impact of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) system, compared with standard high-definition colonoscopy, for APC measurement.METHODS:This was a US-based, multicenter, prospe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of gastroenterology Vol. 119; no. 7; pp. 1383 - 1391
Main Authors Desai, Madhav, Ausk, Karlee, Brannan, Donald, Chhabra, Rajiv, Chan, Walter, Chiorean, Michael, Gross, Seth A., Girotra, Mohit, Haber, Gregory, Hogan, Reed B., Jacob, Bobby, Jonnalagadda, Sreeni, Iles-Shih, Lulu, Kumar, Navin, Law, Joanna, Lee, Linda, Lin, Otto, Mizrahi, Meir, Pacheco, Paulo, Parasa, Sravanthi, Phan, Jennifer, Reeves, Vonda, Sethi, Amrita, Snell, David, Underwood, James, Venu, Nanda, Visrodia, Kavel, Wong, Alina, Winn, Jessica, Wright, Cindy Haden, Sharma, Prateek
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Wolters Kluwer 01.07.2024
Wolters Kluwer Health Medical Research, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-9270
1572-0241
1572-0241
DOI10.14309/ajg.0000000000002664

Cover

More Information
Summary:INTRODUCTION:Adenoma per colonoscopy (APC) has recently been proposed as a quality measure for colonoscopy. We evaluated the impact of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) system, compared with standard high-definition colonoscopy, for APC measurement.METHODS:This was a US-based, multicenter, prospective randomized trial examining a novel AI detection system (EW10-EC02) that enables a real-time colorectal polyp detection enabled with the colonoscope (CAD-EYE). Eligible average-risk subjects (45 years or older) undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy were randomized to undergo either CAD-EYE-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) or conventional colonoscopy (CC). Modified intention-to-treat analysis was performed for all patients who completed colonoscopy with the primary outcome of APC. Secondary outcomes included positive predictive value (total number of adenomas divided by total polyps removed) and adenoma detection rate.RESULTS:In modified intention-to-treat analysis, of 1,031 subjects (age: 59.1 ± 9.8 years; 49.9% male), 510 underwent CAC vs 523 underwent CC with no significant differences in age, gender, ethnicity, or colonoscopy indication between the 2 groups. CAC led to a significantly higher APC compared with CC: 0.99 ± 1.6 vs 0.85 ± 1.5, P = 0.02, incidence rate ratio 1.17 (1.03-1.33, P = 0.02) with no significant difference in the withdrawal time: 11.28 ± 4.59 minutes vs 10.8 ± 4.81 minutes; P = 0.11 between the 2 groups. Difference in positive predictive value of a polyp being an adenoma among CAC and CC was less than 10% threshold established: 48.6% vs 54%, 95% CI −9.56% to −1.48%. There were no significant differences in adenoma detection rate (46.9% vs 42.8%), advanced adenoma (6.5% vs 6.3%), sessile serrated lesion detection rate (12.9% vs 10.1%), and polyp detection rate (63.9% vs 59.3%) between the 2 groups. There was a higher polyp per colonoscopy with CAC compared with CC: 1.68 ± 2.1 vs 1.33 ± 1.8 (incidence rate ratio 1.27; 1.15-1.4; P < 0.01).DISCUSSION:Use of a novel AI detection system showed to a significantly higher number of adenomas per colonoscopy compared with conventional high-definition colonoscopy without any increase in colonoscopy withdrawal time, thus supporting the use of AI-assisted colonoscopy to improve colonoscopy quality (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04979962).
Bibliography:Correspondence: Prateek Sharma, MD, FACG. E-mail: psharma@kumc.edu.SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL accompanies this paper at http://links.lww.com/AJG/D166
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0002-9270
1572-0241
1572-0241
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002664