Scanpath Regularity as an Index of Reading Comprehension

Recent research on the potential of using eye-tracking to measure reading comprehension ability suggests that the relationship between standard eye-tracking measures and reading comprehension is influenced by differences in task demands between comprehension assessments. We compared standard eye-tra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific studies of reading Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 79 - 100
Main Authors Mézière, Diane C., Yu, Lili, McArthur, Genevieve, Reichle, Erik D., von der Malsburg, Titus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Routledge 02.01.2024
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1088-8438
1532-799X
DOI10.1080/10888438.2023.2232063

Cover

More Information
Summary:Recent research on the potential of using eye-tracking to measure reading comprehension ability suggests that the relationship between standard eye-tracking measures and reading comprehension is influenced by differences in task demands between comprehension assessments. We compared standard eye-tracking measures and scanpath regularity as predictors of reading comprehension scores. We used a dataset in which 79 participants (mean age: 22 years, 82% females, 76% monolingual English speakers) were administered three widely-used reading comprehension assessments with varying task demands while their eye movements were monitored: the York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension; (YARC), the Gray Oral Reading Test; (GORT-5), and the sentence comprehension subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test; (WRAT-4). Results showed that scanpath regularity measures, similarly to standard eye-tracking measures, were influenced by differences in task demands between the three tests. Nevertheless, both types of eye-tracking measures made unique contributions as predictors of comprehension and the best set of predictors included both standard eye-tracking measures and at least one scanpath measure across tests. The results provide evidence that scanpaths capture differences in eye-movement patterns missed by standard eye-tracking measures. Overall, the results highlight the effect of task demands on eye-movement behavior and suggest that reading goals and task demands need to be considered when interpreting eye-tracking data.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1088-8438
1532-799X
DOI:10.1080/10888438.2023.2232063