Commercial Companies in Party Networks: Digital Advertising Firms in US Elections from 2006-2016

Previous research has found that digital advertising companies such as Facebook and Google function similarly to political consultants, influencing the messaging choices of political clients. This paper situates those insights in the theory of parties as extended networks and presents the first quan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolitical communication Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 147 - 165
Main Author Barrett, Bridget
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Routledge 04.03.2022
Taylor & Francis LLC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1058-4609
1091-7675
1091-7675
DOI10.1080/10584609.2021.1978021

Cover

More Information
Summary:Previous research has found that digital advertising companies such as Facebook and Google function similarly to political consultants, influencing the messaging choices of political clients. This paper situates those insights in the theory of parties as extended networks and presents the first quantitative descriptive analysis of all companies that have provided federal political committees with digital advertising services in national elections. Network analysis measures of political groups registered with the Federal Election Committee in the United States (n = 2,064) and the types of companies they hired for digital political advertising services (political agencies, commercial agencies, digital advertising platforms, or other; n = 1,022) over three midterm and general elections (2006-2016) show that the number of political committees and companies have both dramatically increased since 2008 and that Facebook and Google have become the two most central members of the network. As influencers of the targeting and content of campaign messages, these companies should be considered consequential members of electoral party 0networks. This study contributes to research on political consulting and to the theory of parties as extended networks by demonstrating how opening the inclusion criteria for subject selection can uncover unexpected players, such as the private, previously considered nonpartisan, nonpolitical companies present here.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1058-4609
1091-7675
1091-7675
DOI:10.1080/10584609.2021.1978021