Assay validation for left-censored data

In laboratory validation studies, it is often important to assess agreement between two assays, based on different techniques. Oftentimes, both assays have lower limits of detection and thus measurements are left censored. For example, in studies of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), the branched D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 24; no. 21; pp. 3347 - 3360
Main Authors Barnhart, Huiman X., Song, Jingli, Lyles, Robert H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 15.11.2005
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0277-6715
1097-0258
DOI10.1002/sim.2225

Cover

More Information
Summary:In laboratory validation studies, it is often important to assess agreement between two assays, based on different techniques. Oftentimes, both assays have lower limits of detection and thus measurements are left censored. For example, in studies of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), the branched DNA (bDNA) assay was developed to quantify HIV‐1 RNA concentrations in plasma. Validation of newer assays, such as the RT‐PCR (reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) involves assessing agreement of measurements obtained using the two techniques. Both bDNA and RT‐PCR assays have lower limits of detection and thus new statistical methods are needed for assessing agreement between two left‐censored variables. In this paper, we present maximum likelihood and generalized estimating equations approaches to evaluate agreement between two assays that are subject to lower limits of detection. The concordance correlation coefficient is used as an agreement index. The methodology is illustrated using HIV RNA assay data collected as part of a long‐term HIV cohort study. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:Emory University Quadrangle Fund
ArticleID:SIM2225
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease
ark:/67375/WNG-CBTBQ5DQ-X
National Cancer Institute
NIH - No. R01 MH070028-01A1
istex:0BD38AB7382AE7D231CBF92F3CA4031E86E57954
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/sim.2225