The relationship between basic, instrumental, and advanced activities of daily living and executive functioning in geriatric patients with neurocognitive disorders

• Published in: International journal of geriatric psychiatry Vol. 34; no. 6; pp. 889 - 899
• Main Authors: Cornelis, Elise, Gorus, Ellen, Van Schelvergem, Nele, De Vriendt, Patricia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2019
• Subjects: Activities of daily living; Activities of Daily Living - psychology; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer disease; Alzheimer Disease - psychology; Alzheimer's disease; Analysis of Variance; assessment; Case-Control Studies; Cognition; Cognitive ability; Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology; dementia; everyday functioning; Executive Function; executive functions; Female; Geriatric psychiatry; Geriatrics; Humans; Male; mild cognitive impairment; Neurodegenerative diseases; Neuropsychological Tests; Trail Making Test; assessment; Alzheimer disease; executive functions; activities of daily living; dementia; mild cognitive impairment; everyday functioning
• ISSN: 0885-6230; 1099-1166; 1099-1166
• DOI: 10.1002/gps.5087

Objective Although many studies explored the relationship between executive functions (EF) and activities of daily living (ADLs) in cognitive disorders, previous studies used measurements without well‐defined levels of ADLs. This study explored the relationship between EF and the threefold classification of everyday functioning (basic or b‐, instrumental or i‐, and advanced or a‐ADLs) and examined how EF account for the variance in this triad of everyday functioning. Methods A sample of 44 cognitively healthy persons, 41 persons with mild cognitive impairment, and 35 persons with Alzheimer disease were assessed with comprehensive measures of EF and the b‐, i‐, and a‐ADL tools. Results Correlations demonstrated that subjects with higher executive dysfunctions have more limitations in b‐, i‐, and a‐ADLs. The highest significant correlations with measures of EF were seen in i‐ and a‐ADLs (ranging from r = −0.193 to r = −0.559, P < 0.05). However, correlations with a‐ADLs were not stronger than with i‐ADLs. The multivariate analyses revealed Trail Making Test A (TMT‐A) as a significant contributor of everyday functioning in b‐ADLs, as well as i‐ and a‐ADLs, and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and Animal Fluency Test (AFT) seemed to contribute significantly to variance in i‐ and a‐ADLs. Conclusions EF are less related to b‐ADLs than i‐ and a‐ADLs and contribute to the same amount of variance to limitations in both i‐ and a‐ADLs. This study recommends using the TMT‐A, CDT, and AFT as screening tools to indicate the need for profound evaluation of ADLs in older persons with neurocognitive disorders.