Level-Set Method for Image Analysis of Schlemm's Canal and Trabecular Meshwork

To evaluate different segmentation methods in analyzing Schlemm's canal (SC) and the trabecular meshwork (TM) in ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images. Twenty-six healthy volunteers were recruited. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured while study subjects blew a trumpet. Images were obta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTranslational vision science & technology Vol. 9; no. 10; p. 7
Main Authors Wang, Xin, Zhai, Yuxi, Liu, Xueyan, Zhu, Wei, Gao, Jianlu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 01.09.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2164-2591
2164-2591
DOI10.1167/tvst.9.10.7

Cover

More Information
Summary:To evaluate different segmentation methods in analyzing Schlemm's canal (SC) and the trabecular meshwork (TM) in ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images. Twenty-six healthy volunteers were recruited. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured while study subjects blew a trumpet. Images were obtained at different IOPs by 50-MHz UBM. ImageJ software and three segmentation methods- -means, fuzzy C-means, and level set-were applied to segment the UBM images. The quantitative analysis of the TM-SC region was based on the segmentation results. The relative error and the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to quantify the accuracy and the repeatability of measurements. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations between the IOP and the TM and SC geometric measurements. A total of 104 UBM images were obtained. Among them, 84 were adequately clear to be segmented. The level-set method results had a higher similarity to ImageJ results than the other two methods. The ICC values of the level-set method were 0.97, 0.95, 0.9, and 0.57, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients for the IOP to the SC area, SC perimeter, SC length, and TM width were -0.91, -0.72, -0.66, and -0.61 ( < 0.0001), respectively. The level-set method showed better accuracy than the other two methods. Compared with manual methods, it can achieve similar precision, better repeatability, and greater efficiency. Therefore, the level-set method can be used for reliable UBM image segmentation. The level-set method can be used to analyze TM and SC region in UBM images semiautomatically.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2164-2591
2164-2591
DOI:10.1167/tvst.9.10.7