Robotic Single-Site Plus One-Port Myomectomy versus Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Robotic single-site plus one-port myomectomy (RSOM) was designed to reduce the number of incision sites for greater cosmetic satisfaction of patients while retaining the benefits of conventional robotic multi-site myomectomy (CRM). Robotic single-site plus two-port myomectomy (RSTM) eliminated one p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inYonsei medical journal Vol. 65; no. 7; pp. 406 - 412
Main Authors Choi, Su Hyeon, Won, Seyeon, Lee, Nara, Shim, So Hyun, Kim, Mi Kyoung, Kim, Mi-La, Jung, Yong Wook, Yun, Bo Seong, Jun, Hye Sun, Seong, Seok Ju
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Yonsei University College of Medicine 01.07.2024
연세대학교의과대학
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0513-5796
1976-2437
1976-2437
DOI10.3349/ymj.2023.0434

Cover

More Information
Summary:Robotic single-site plus one-port myomectomy (RSOM) was designed to reduce the number of incision sites for greater cosmetic satisfaction of patients while retaining the benefits of conventional robotic multi-site myomectomy (CRM). Robotic single-site plus two-port myomectomy (RSTM) eliminated one port relative to conventional CRM, and RSOM achieved the same advantage with respect to RSTM. This study aimed to compare RSOM with RSTM in terms of their respective methodologies and surgical outcomes. The medical records of 230 patients who had undergone RSOM and 146 patients who had undergone RSTM were reviewed. The groups' surgical outcomes were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. In the total data, RSOM had a shorter operative time (135.1±57.4 min vs. 149.9±46.2 min, =0.009) and a shorter hospital stay (5.2±0.5 days vs. 5.4±0.7 days, =0.033) relative to RSTM. The PSM analysis showed that there were no statistically significant intergroup differences in the patients' baseline characteristics. Regarding the surgical outcomes, the RSOM group showed shorter operative time (129.2±49.3 min vs. 148.7±46.3 min, =0.001) compared to the RSTM group. Compared with RSTM, RSOM was associated with shorter operative time. Additionally, more detailed comparative and prospective studies are needed to evaluate RSOM relative to RSTM.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
https://www.eymj.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3349/ymj.2023.0434
ISSN:0513-5796
1976-2437
1976-2437
DOI:10.3349/ymj.2023.0434