Critical time-step size analysis and mass scaling by ghost-penalty for immersogeometric explicit dynamics

In this article, we study the effect of small-cut elements on the critical time-step size in an immersogeometric explicit dynamics context. We analyze different formulations for second-order (membrane) and fourth-order (shell-type) equations, and derive scaling relations between the critical time-st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputer methods in applied mechanics and engineering Vol. 412; p. 116074
Main Authors Stoter, Stein K.F., Divi, Sai C., van Brummelen, E. Harald, Larson, Mats G., de Prenter, Frits, Verhoosel, Clemens V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.07.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0045-7825
1879-2138
DOI10.1016/j.cma.2023.116074

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this article, we study the effect of small-cut elements on the critical time-step size in an immersogeometric explicit dynamics context. We analyze different formulations for second-order (membrane) and fourth-order (shell-type) equations, and derive scaling relations between the critical time-step size and the cut-element size for various types of cuts. In particular, we focus on different approaches for the weak imposition of Dirichlet conditions: by penalty enforcement and with Nitsche’s method. The conventional stability requirement for Nitsche’s method necessitates either a cut-size dependent penalty parameter, or an additional ghost-penalty stabilization term. Our findings show that both techniques suffer from cut-size dependent critical time-step sizes, but the addition of a ghost-penalty term to the mass matrix serves to mitigate this issue. We confirm that this form of ‘mass-scaling’ does not adversely affect error and convergence characteristics for a transient membrane example, and has the potential to increase the critical time-step size by orders of magnitude. Finally, for a prototypical simulation of a Kirchhoff–Love shell, our stabilized Nitsche formulation reduces the solution error by well over an order of magnitude compared to a penalty formulation at equal time-step size.
ISSN:0045-7825
1879-2138
DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116074