Reliability and Validity of a Japanese Version of the Cost of Care Index

The home management of chronic disability in the elderly often relies upon the receipt of family. These caregivers have been shown to experience a considerable burden in providing day-to-day care. It is important that identifying problem areas may result in the need of consider alternatives for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNihon Rōnen Igakkai zasshi Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 403 - 409
Main Authors Iijima, Setsu, Orimo, Hajime, Mizoguchi, Tamaki, Niino, Naoakira
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japan The Japan Geriatrics Society 1995
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0300-9173
DOI10.3143/geriatrics.32.403

Cover

More Information
Summary:The home management of chronic disability in the elderly often relies upon the receipt of family. These caregivers have been shown to experience a considerable burden in providing day-to-day care. It is important that identifying problem areas may result in the need of consider alternatives for the care of an elderly person, identify and mobilize existing community resources to relieve some of the “cost”. We studied the reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Cost of Care Index (CCI) which was originally developed by Kosberg et al as a case management tool in the assessment of caregivers. Our subject consisted of 27 cases with dementia (mean age 74.5 years), and 15 cases of patients with neurological disorders without dementia (80.7 years), and their caregivers. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency were very good; the coefficient of correlation between CCI scores at the two interviews was 0.83, the coefficient of internal consistency was 0.92. CCI scores correlated significantly with ADL-20 scores, DBD score and caregivers' SDS scores; r=-0.48, r=0.46 and r=0.36, respectively. Our results indicate that the CCI is highly reliable, and may be useful for assessment caregivers' burden.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0300-9173
DOI:10.3143/geriatrics.32.403