Modified Energy-Based Design Method of the Precast Partially Steel-Reinforced Concrete Beam–CFST Column Eccentrically Braced Frame

• Published in: Buildings (Basel) Vol. 15; no. 11; p. 1797
• Main Authors: Hou, Fugui, Chong, Weiguang, Lin, Yu, He, Xijun, Zhang, Guanglei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.06.2025
• Subjects: additional influence; Building design; Case studies; Composite structures; Concrete; Concrete columns; Dampers; Design techniques; Drift; Ductility; Earthquakes; Eccentric bracing; eccentrically braced frame; Eccentricity; energy balance; Energy dissipation; Energy distribution; High rise buildings; Layouts; Methods; multi-stage energy dissipation; precast composite structure; Precast concrete; Reinforced concrete; Reinforcement (structures); Reinforcing steels; Seismic activity; Seismic engineering; Seismic response; Skyscrapers; Steel tubes; Tall buildings; United States
• ISSN: 2075-5309; 2075-5309
• DOI: 10.3390/buildings15111797

The eccentrically braced frame (EBF) is a typical structural system used in high-rise buildings. Current related design methods focus on the concrete and steel structures rather than on the complex composite structure. In addition, they tend to overlook the contribution of the energy-dissipation unit and its corresponding additional influence on the structure. In this study, a precast composite EBF structure is selected as a case study, including the partially steel-reinforced concrete (PSRC) beam and the concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) column. A modified energy-based design method is proposed to leverage the excellent seismic performance of the precast composite EBF structure. The multi-stage energy-dissipation mechanism and the additional influence of the eccentric braces are systematically considered through the energy distribution coefficient and the layout of dampers. A case study of a 12-floor, three-bay precast composite EBF structure is conducted using a series of nonlinear time-history analyses. Critical seismic responses, including the maximum inter-story drift ratio, residual inter-story drift ratio, and peak acceleration, are systematically analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed design theory. The distribution coefficient is recommended to range from 0.70 to 0.80 to balance the energy-dissipation contribution between the frame and the eccentric braces. In terms of the damper layout, the energy-dissipation contribution of the eccentric brace should differ among the lower, middle, and upper floors.