Prostate cancer risk, screening and management in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations
Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour suppressor genes are associated with prostate cancer risk; however, optimal screening protocols for individuals with these mutations have been a subject of debate. Several prospective studies of prostate cancer incidence and screening among BRCA1/2 mutation ca...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature reviews. Urology Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 205 - 216 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.04.2023
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1759-4812 1759-4820 1759-4820 |
DOI | 10.1038/s41585-022-00680-4 |
Cover
Summary: | Mutations in the
BRCA1
and
BRCA2
tumour suppressor genes are associated with prostate cancer risk; however, optimal screening protocols for individuals with these mutations have been a subject of debate. Several prospective studies of prostate cancer incidence and screening among
BRCA1/2
mutation carriers have indicated at least a twofold to fourfold increase in prostate cancer risk among carriers of
BRCA2
mutations compared with the general population. Moreover,
BRCA2
mutations are associated with more aggressive, high-grade disease characteristics at diagnosis, more aggressive clinical behaviour and greater prostate cancer-specific mortality. The risk for
BRCA1
mutations seems to be attenuated compared with
BRCA2
. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement or prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone is an imperfect indicator of clinically significant prostate cancer; therefore,
BRCA1/2
mutation carriers might benefit from refined risk stratification strategies. However, the long-term impact of prostate cancer screening is unknown, and the optimal management of
BRCA1/2
carriers with prostate cancer has not been defined. Whether timely localized therapy can improve overall survival in the screened population is uncertain. Long-term results of prospective studies are awaited to confirm the optimal screening strategies and benefits of prostate cancer screening among
BRCA1/2
mutation carriers, and whether these approaches ultimately have a positive impact on survival and quality of life in these patients.
Mutations in the
BRCA1
and
BRCA2
tumour suppressor genes are associated with prostate cancer risk, but optimal screening protocols for individuals with these mutations have been a subject of debate. In this Review, the authors discuss the risk associated with
BRCA
1/2
mutations and consider how, and whether, a screening programme should be implemented for these individuals.
Key points
Carriers of germline
BRCA2
mutations have a twofold to fourfold higher risk of prostate cancer than the general population; for
BRCA1
mutation carriers, this association is attenuated.
BRCA2
mutation carriers are more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer at a younger age than non-carriers.
For
BRCA1/2
mutation carriers, the use of advanced prebiopsy risk stratification tools might be beneficial, instead of guideline-recommended prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.
PSA measurement or prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone is inadequate for screening in
BRCA1/2
mutation carriers, owing to the inherent limitations of these tests.
Screened
BRCA1/2
mutation carriers might have an increased risk of prostate cancer-specific death, but these patients often develop other lethal malignancies that could limit the benefits of prostate cancer screening.
Benefits and risks of prostate cancer screening among
BRCA1/2
mutation carriers must be determined and optimal early treatment strategies identified to improve quality of life and survival. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1759-4812 1759-4820 1759-4820 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41585-022-00680-4 |