Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Complications After Liver Transplantation Based on Transfer Learning

Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for acute liver failure, cirrhosis, and even liver cancer. The prediction of postoperative complications is of great significance for liver transplantation. However, the existing prediction methods based on traditional machine learning ar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInterdisciplinary sciences : computational life sciences Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 123 - 140
Main Authors Zhang, Ying, Shangguan, Chenyuan, Zhang, Xuena, Ma, Jialin, He, Jiyuan, Jia, Meng, Chen, Na
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 01.03.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1913-2751
1867-1462
1867-1462
DOI10.1007/s12539-023-00588-6

Cover

More Information
Summary:Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for acute liver failure, cirrhosis, and even liver cancer. The prediction of postoperative complications is of great significance for liver transplantation. However, the existing prediction methods based on traditional machine learning are often unavailable or unreliable due to the insufficient amount of real liver transplantation data. Therefore, we propose a new framework to increase the accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis of complications after liver transplantation with transfer learning, which can handle small-scale but high-dimensional data problems. Furthermore, since data samples are often high dimensional in the real world, capturing key features that influence postoperative complications can help make the correct diagnosis for patients. So, we also introduce the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method into our framework for exploring the key features of postoperative complications. We used data obtained from 425 patients with 456 features in our experiments. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms all compared baseline methods in predicting postoperative complications. In our work, the average precision, the mean recall, and the mean F1 score reach 91.22%, 91.70%, and 91.18%, respectively. Graphic Abstract
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1913-2751
1867-1462
1867-1462
DOI:10.1007/s12539-023-00588-6