Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Complications After Liver Transplantation Based on Transfer Learning
Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for acute liver failure, cirrhosis, and even liver cancer. The prediction of postoperative complications is of great significance for liver transplantation. However, the existing prediction methods based on traditional machine learning ar...
Saved in:
| Published in | Interdisciplinary sciences : computational life sciences Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 123 - 140 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Singapore
Springer Nature Singapore
01.03.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1913-2751 1867-1462 1867-1462 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12539-023-00588-6 |
Cover
| Summary: | Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for acute liver failure, cirrhosis, and even liver cancer. The prediction of postoperative complications is of great significance for liver transplantation. However, the existing prediction methods based on traditional machine learning are often unavailable or unreliable due to the insufficient amount of real liver transplantation data. Therefore, we propose a new framework to increase the accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis of complications after liver transplantation with transfer learning, which can handle small-scale but high-dimensional data problems. Furthermore, since data samples are often high dimensional in the real world, capturing key features that influence postoperative complications can help make the correct diagnosis for patients. So, we also introduce the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method into our framework for exploring the key features of postoperative complications. We used data obtained from 425 patients with 456 features in our experiments. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms all compared baseline methods in predicting postoperative complications. In our work, the average precision, the mean recall, and the mean F1 score reach 91.22%, 91.70%, and 91.18%, respectively.
Graphic Abstract |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 1913-2751 1867-1462 1867-1462 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s12539-023-00588-6 |