The etiology of the frugal consumer

This study examines several psychological factors hypothesized as antecedents of frugality. Although external forces, such as downturns in economic activity, can promote frugal behavior, it is also likely associated with a syndrome of individual differences that are independent of economic condition...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of retailing and consumer services Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 175 - 184
Main Authors Goldsmith, Ronald E., Reinecke Flynn, Leisa, Clark, Ronald A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0969-6989
1873-1384
DOI10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.005

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study examines several psychological factors hypothesized as antecedents of frugality. Although external forces, such as downturns in economic activity, can promote frugal behavior, it is also likely associated with a syndrome of individual differences that are independent of economic conditions. These include values, personality characteristics, and other consumer characteristics. Our study used data from 256 U.S. consumers to test hypothesized relationships between frugality measured as a personality- or lifestyle-type construct characteristic embedded in the social psychology of consumption. We identified four key constructs as likely antecedents of frugality: materialism, status consumption, brand engagement, and consumer independence. The results showed that frugal consumers are less materialistic, less status conscious, and less involved with brands than other consumers, but are more independent from the opinions of others in their consumer decision making. •Frugal consumers are less materialistic than other consumers.•Frugal consumers are less status conscious than other consumers.•Frugal consumers are less engaged with brands than other consumers.•Frugal consumers are more independent from the opinions of others in their consumer decision making.•Frugality is a two dimensional construct rather than unidimensional.
ISSN:0969-6989
1873-1384
DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.005