Accuracy of the digital anal examination in women with fecal incontinence

Introduction and hypothesis This study aims to determine the accuracy of digital rectal examination (DRE) to detect anal sphincter defects when compared to endoanal ultrasound (US) in women with fecal incontinence (FI). Methods Seventy-four patients identified by retrospective chart review who prese...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Urogynecology Journal Vol. 23; no. 6; pp. 765 - 768
Main Authors Jeppson, Peter C., Paraiso, Marie Fidela R., Jelovsek, J. Eric, Barber, Matthew D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Springer-Verlag 01.06.2012
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0937-3462
1433-3023
1433-3023
DOI10.1007/s00192-011-1590-1

Cover

More Information
Summary:Introduction and hypothesis This study aims to determine the accuracy of digital rectal examination (DRE) to detect anal sphincter defects when compared to endoanal ultrasound (US) in women with fecal incontinence (FI). Methods Seventy-four patients identified by retrospective chart review who presented with complaints of bothersome FI who underwent endoanal US are the subjects of this analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated for the ability of the DRE to detect anal sphincter defects. Results Anal sphincter defect was suspected on DRE in 75%. At endoanal US, external sphincter defects were noted in all three segments in 41% (complete defect) while partial defects were noted in 30%. DRE demonstrated a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 32%, +likelihood ratio 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95–1.16) and −likelihood ratio of 0.6 (95% CI, 0.2–1.24) for detecting a complete EAS defect on endoanal US. Conclusion DRE has poor specificity for detecting anal sphincter defects seen on endoanal US.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0937-3462
1433-3023
1433-3023
DOI:10.1007/s00192-011-1590-1