Accelerated real-time cardiac MRI using iterative sparse SENSE reconstruction: comparing performance in patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

Objectives To compare accelerated real-time cardiac MRI (CMR) using sparse spatial and temporal undersampling and non-linear iterative SENSE reconstruction (RT IS SENSE) with real-time CMR (RT) and segmented CMR (SEG) in a cohort that included atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Methods We evaluated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean radiology Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 3088 - 3096
Main Authors Allen, Bradley D., Carr, Maria L., Markl, Michael, Zenge, Michael O., Schmidt, Michaela, Nadar, Mariappan S., Spottiswoode, Bruce, Collins, Jeremy D., Carr, James C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.07.2018
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0938-7994
1432-1084
1432-1084
DOI10.1007/s00330-017-5283-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives To compare accelerated real-time cardiac MRI (CMR) using sparse spatial and temporal undersampling and non-linear iterative SENSE reconstruction (RT IS SENSE) with real-time CMR (RT) and segmented CMR (SEG) in a cohort that included atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Methods We evaluated 27 subjects, including 11 AF patients, by acquiring steady-state free precession cine images covering the left ventricle (LV) at 1.5 T with SEG (acceleration factor 2, TR 42 ms, 1.8 × 1.8 × 6 mm 3 ), RT (acceleration factor 3, TR 62 ms, 3.0 × 3.0 × 7 mm 3 ), and RT IS SENSE (acceleration factor 9.9-12, TR 42 ms, 2.0 × 2.0 × 7 mm 3 ). We performed quantitative LV functional analysis in sinus rhythm (SR) patients and qualitatively scored image quality, noise and artefact using a 5-point Likert scale in the complete cohort and AF and SR subgroups. Results There was no difference between LV functional parameters between acquisitions in SR patients. RT IS SENSE short-axis image quality was superior to SEG (4.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.9 ± 1.1, p = 0.007) and RT (3.8 ± 0.4, p = 0.003). There was reduced artefact in RT IS SENSE compared to SEG (4.4 ± 0.6 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.04), driven by arrhythmia performance. RT IS SENSE short-axis image quality was superior to SEG (4.6 ± 0.5 vs. 3.1 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) in the AF subgroup. Conclusion Accelerated real-time CMR with iterative sparse SENSE provides excellent clinical performance, especially in patients with AF. Key Points • Iterative sparse SENSE significantly accelerates real-time cardiovascular MRI acquisitions. • It provides excellent qualitative and quantitative performance in sinus rhythm patients. • It outperforms standard segmented acquisitions in patients with atrial fibrillation. • It improves the trade-off between temporal and spatial resolution in real-time imaging.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-017-5283-0