Evading the curse of dimensionality in nonparametric density estimation with simplified vine copulas

Practical applications of nonparametric density estimators in more than three dimensions suffer a great deal from the well-known curse of dimensionality: convergence slows down as dimension increases. We show that one can evade the curse of dimensionality by assuming a simplified vine copula model f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of multivariate analysis Vol. 151; pp. 69 - 89
Main Authors Nagler, Thomas, Czado, Claudia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Inc 01.10.2016
Taylor & Francis LLC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0047-259X
1095-7243
DOI10.1016/j.jmva.2016.07.003

Cover

More Information
Summary:Practical applications of nonparametric density estimators in more than three dimensions suffer a great deal from the well-known curse of dimensionality: convergence slows down as dimension increases. We show that one can evade the curse of dimensionality by assuming a simplified vine copula model for the dependence between variables. We formulate a general nonparametric estimator for such a model and show under high-level assumptions that the speed of convergence is independent of dimension. We further discuss a particular implementation for which we validate the high-level assumptions and establish asymptotic normality. Simulation experiments illustrate a large gain in finite sample performance when the simplifying assumption is at least approximately true. But even when it is severely violated, the vine copula based approach proves advantageous as soon as more than a few variables are involved. Lastly, we give an application of the estimator to a classification problem from astrophysics. •A nonparametric density estimator based on simplified vine copulas is proposed.•The convergence rate of the proposed estimator is independent of dimension.•Simulations illustrate a huge gain in accuracy if the model assumption is true.•When it is violated, the estimator is still favorable if the dimension is not small.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0047-259X
1095-7243
DOI:10.1016/j.jmva.2016.07.003