Humanitarianism, securitization, and containment in Jordan's Za'atari Refugee Camp

Through a case study on Za'atari, the largest Syrian refugee camp in Jordan, this paper critically explores a contemporary example of intersection between local and global humanitarian and securitization processes in refugee governance. The paper argues that Syrian refugees have been subjected...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe British journal of sociology Vol. 72; no. 4; pp. 1141 - 1155
Main Author Pasha, Suraina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-1315
1468-4446
1468-4446
DOI10.1111/1468-4446.12827

Cover

More Information
Summary:Through a case study on Za'atari, the largest Syrian refugee camp in Jordan, this paper critically explores a contemporary example of intersection between local and global humanitarian and securitization processes in refugee governance. The paper argues that Syrian refugees have been subjected to humanitarian care and securitized treatment, with their construction in terms of potential threat to State security interests spiking in correlation with insecurities over the expansion of the “Islamic State” (IS). The paper tracks the suit of measures implemented by the host Jordanian State, with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), to produce docile refugee subjects of “humanitarian government” in a closed camp. It notes how the UNHCR invariably augments and extends the remit of Jordanian State power at the expense of refugee rights, in the name of ensuring refugee and aid worker security and the effectiveness of the aid operation. The camp plays a critical role in a performative politics of containment targeting local and global audiences.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1315
1468-4446
1468-4446
DOI:10.1111/1468-4446.12827