A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation, stimulant medication, and an active control in the treatment of ADHD
Background This research aimed to compare computer‐assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CACR) psychostimulants (MED) and placebo CACR (PCACR) in the treatment of ADHD using a multiarm parallel design. Methods Thirty‐four boys with ADHD, aged 7–12, were randomly assigned to either CACR (n = 12), MED (n...
Saved in:
Published in | Child and adolescent mental health Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 217 - 224 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.11.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1475-357X 1475-3588 |
DOI | 10.1111/camh.12157 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
This research aimed to compare computer‐assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CACR) psychostimulants (MED) and placebo CACR (PCACR) in the treatment of ADHD using a multiarm parallel design.
Methods
Thirty‐four boys with ADHD, aged 7–12, were randomly assigned to either CACR (n = 12), MED (n = 11), or PCACR (n = 11). However, the study was not blinded and medication doses might be suboptimal given the lack of titration. Continuous performance test, Tower‐of‐London, forward/backward digit span, span board, Raven's progressive matrices, and SNAP‐IV were completed at baseline, posttest, and follow‐up.
Results
Computer‐assisted cognitive rehabilitation outperformed both MED and PCACR on backward digit span at posttest and PCACR at follow‐up. CACR outperformed PCACR and MED on forward digit span at posttest and PCACR at follow‐up. CACR outperformed MED on span board at posttest. CACR outperformed PCACR and MED on Raven's matrices at posttest. CACR and PCACR scored lower than MED on ADHD‐PHI at posttest. CACR scored lower than MED on ADHD‐C at posttest.
Conclusions
Immediately after interventions, CACR improved certain simple executive functions (EFs) as much as active stimulant medication. On complex EFs, CACR was superior to active stimulant medication and PCACR. CACR reduced behavioral symptoms of ADHD more than active stimulant medication. However, at 3‐month follow‐up, maintenance of the CACR gains was weak. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-03GSKN7T-S Appendix S1. Additional details about methods. istex:4A98B3897CDD0DB9C002CA460958A2B4C49E3B8F ArticleID:CAMH12157 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1475-357X 1475-3588 |
DOI: | 10.1111/camh.12157 |