A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation, stimulant medication, and an active control in the treatment of ADHD

Background This research aimed to compare computer‐assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CACR) psychostimulants (MED) and placebo CACR (PCACR) in the treatment of ADHD using a multiarm parallel design. Methods Thirty‐four boys with ADHD, aged 7–12, were randomly assigned to either CACR (n = 12), MED (n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChild and adolescent mental health Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 217 - 224
Main Authors Azami, Saeed, Moghadas, Alireza, Sohrabi-Esmrood, Faramarz, Nazifi, Morteza, Mirmohamad, Mahdieh, Hemmati, Fatemeh, Ahmadi, Ameneh, Hamzeh-poor, Pariya, Khari, Saeedeh, Lakes, Kimberley
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1475-357X
1475-3588
DOI10.1111/camh.12157

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background This research aimed to compare computer‐assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CACR) psychostimulants (MED) and placebo CACR (PCACR) in the treatment of ADHD using a multiarm parallel design. Methods Thirty‐four boys with ADHD, aged 7–12, were randomly assigned to either CACR (n = 12), MED (n = 11), or PCACR (n = 11). However, the study was not blinded and medication doses might be suboptimal given the lack of titration. Continuous performance test, Tower‐of‐London, forward/backward digit span, span board, Raven's progressive matrices, and SNAP‐IV were completed at baseline, posttest, and follow‐up. Results Computer‐assisted cognitive rehabilitation outperformed both MED and PCACR on backward digit span at posttest and PCACR at follow‐up. CACR outperformed PCACR and MED on forward digit span at posttest and PCACR at follow‐up. CACR outperformed MED on span board at posttest. CACR outperformed PCACR and MED on Raven's matrices at posttest. CACR and PCACR scored lower than MED on ADHD‐PHI at posttest. CACR scored lower than MED on ADHD‐C at posttest. Conclusions Immediately after interventions, CACR improved certain simple executive functions (EFs) as much as active stimulant medication. On complex EFs, CACR was superior to active stimulant medication and PCACR. CACR reduced behavioral symptoms of ADHD more than active stimulant medication. However, at 3‐month follow‐up, maintenance of the CACR gains was weak.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-03GSKN7T-S
Appendix S1. Additional details about methods.
istex:4A98B3897CDD0DB9C002CA460958A2B4C49E3B8F
ArticleID:CAMH12157
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1475-357X
1475-3588
DOI:10.1111/camh.12157