Application of identity vectors for EEG classification

•We show how to perform subject verification of EEGs using I-Vectors.•Three feature sets are tested over two data sets by three algorithms.•I-Vector performance meets or exceeds that of Mahalanobis and GMM classifiers.•I-Vector classification is steady for feature sets, datasets, and epochs. Finding...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neuroscience methods Vol. 311; pp. 338 - 350
Main Authors Ward, Christian, Obeid, Iyad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.01.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0165-0270
1872-678X
1872-678X
DOI10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.09.015

Cover

More Information
Summary:•We show how to perform subject verification of EEGs using I-Vectors.•Three feature sets are tested over two data sets by three algorithms.•I-Vector performance meets or exceeds that of Mahalanobis and GMM classifiers.•I-Vector classification is steady for feature sets, datasets, and epochs. Finding an optimal EEG subject verification algorithm is a long standing goal within the EEG community. For every advancement made, another feature set, classifier, or dataset is often introduced; tracking improvements in classification without a consistent benchmark, such as a classifier-feature pairing tested on a publicly available dataset, makes it difficult to understand how and why these improvements occur. Following on previous biometric experiments, I-Vectors and Gaussian Mixture Model-Universal Background Models are compared to an established Mahalanobis classifier. A second experiment then addresses the impact of epoch duration as a function of classification performance across all three classifiers. The experimental classification results indicate that I-Vectors are more robust than the other classifiers displaying less sensitivity to epoch duration, data composition, and feature selection. This I-Vector based approach is compared against commonly used EEG classifiers, such as Mahalanobis and Gaussian mixture models. These classifiers are benchmarked using the publicly available PhysioNet database converted into three feature sets, spectral coherence, power spectral density, and cepstral coefficients. The experimental results suggests I-Vectors provide reliable baseline performance by leveling the field between feature set and datasets making them well suited for EEG signal processing tasks.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-0270
1872-678X
1872-678X
DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.09.015