Real-world car-to-pedestrian-crash data from an urban centre

• Published in: Journal of trauma management and outcomes Vol. 4; no. 1; p. 2
• Main Authors: Schmucker, Uli, Beirau, Melissa, Frank, Matthias, Stengel, Dirk, Matthes, Gerrit, Ekkernkamp, Axel, Seifert, Julia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 16.02.2010; BioMed Central Ltd
• Subjects: Accidents; Causes of; Decade of Action for Road Safety; Emergency Medicine; Head injuries; Injuries; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Pedestrians; Prognosis; Statistics; Traffic accidents; Traumatic Surgery; United States; Head Impact; Head Injury Criterion; Road Traffic Crash; Head Injury; Injury Severity Score
• ISSN: 1752-2897; 1752-2897
• DOI: 10.1186/1752-2897-4-2

Background Pedestrians are at a high risk for crash and injury. This study aims at comparing data from real world crashes with data gathered from experimental settings. Methods IMPAIR (In-Depth Medical Pedestrian Accident Investigation and Reconstruction) was a prospective, observational study performed in a metropolitan area. Data was collected on-scene, from clinical records, and interviews. Data comprise crash data, details on injury pattern and injury severity. Results Thirty-seven pedestrians (of which 19 males) with a mean 37.1 years of age were included in the study. The mean collision speed was 49.5 km/h (SD 13.7, range, 28 - 93). The mean ISS (31.0, SD 25.4) and the 24% fatality rate indicate a substantial trauma load. The most common AIS 4+ injuries were to the head (23 subjects), followed by chest (8), pelvis (4), and abdomen (2). An association of impact side and injury side (right/left) was found for abdominal, chest, pelvic, and upper limb injuries. Primary head impacts were documented on the windscreen (19 subjects), hood (10), A-pillar (2), and edge of the car roof (2). With bivariate analysis, a significant increase of MAIS 4+ head injury risk was found for collision speeds of >40 km/h (OR 9.00, 95% CI 1.96-41.36). Conclusion The real-world data from this study is in agreement with previous findings from biomechanical models and other simulations. This data suggest that there may be reason to include further pedestrian regulations in EuroNCAP.