Infective endocarditis and cardiac events after transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement: A nationwide cohort study

•Highest rates of IE were observed during the 3-month peri-procedural phase.•TAVI had more IE than bioSAVR, which had more than mechSAVR.•MACE was higher after TAVI vs bioSAVR but not between bioSAVR and mechSAVR.•Younger age, male sex, and higher morbidity were main predictors of developing IE. To...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of infectious diseases Vol. 159; p. 108011
Main Authors Kutz, Alexander, Purtak, Martin, Laager, Rahel, Stortecky, Stefan, Conen, Anna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Canada Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2025
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1201-9712
1878-3511
1878-3511
DOI10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108011

Cover

More Information
Summary:•Highest rates of IE were observed during the 3-month peri-procedural phase.•TAVI had more IE than bioSAVR, which had more than mechSAVR.•MACE was higher after TAVI vs bioSAVR but not between bioSAVR and mechSAVR.•Younger age, male sex, and higher morbidity were main predictors of developing IE. To compare rates of infective endocarditis (IE) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with TAVI, bioprosthetic (bio), and mechanical (mech) SAVR. Population-based cohort study of inpatient adults undergoing TAVI, bioSAVR or mechSAVR for aortic valve stenosis between 2012 and 2021 in Switzerland. In 2 pairwise 1:1 propensity-score matched cohorts (TAVI versus bioSAVR and bioSAVR versus mechSAVR) we analysed the primary outcome of the incidence of IE and secondary outcomes including MACE. Among 18,253 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (mean age 76.6±10.3 years, 43.8% female), the incidence rate (IR) of IE was highest in the first 3 months after the intervention (TAVI, bioSAVR, mechSAVR: 23.61, 18.87, 16.65 per 1000 person-years, respectively). After matching, the rate of IE was higher in patients undergoing TAVI versus bioSAVR (n=2329 pairs, HR 1.56 [95% CI, 1.12-2.18]; incidence rate difference [IRD] 3.84 [95% CI,1.29-6.39] per 1000 person-years), and higher in bioSAVR versus mechSAVR (n=773, HR 2.27 [1.24-4.15]; IRD 4.57 [1.29-7.85] per 1000 person-years). The HRs for MACE were 2.10 [1.90-2.33] and 2.09 [1.58-2.77], respectively. For patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for native aortic valve stenosis, TAVI was associated with higher rates of IE than bioSAVR, as was bioSAVR when compared with mechSAVR.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1201-9712
1878-3511
1878-3511
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108011