Estimates of Kolmogorov complexity in approximating cantor sets
Our aim is to quantify how complex a Cantor set is as we approximate it better and better. We formalize this by asking what is the shortest program, running on a universal Turing machine, which produces this set at the precision [varepsilon] in the sense of Hausdorff distance. This is the Kolmogorov...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Nonlinearity Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 459 - 479 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        Bristol
          IOP Publishing
    
        01.02.2011
     Institute of Physics  | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0951-7715 1361-6544  | 
| DOI | 10.1088/0951-7715/24/2/005 | 
Cover
| Summary: | Our aim is to quantify how complex a Cantor set is as we approximate it better and better. We formalize this by asking what is the shortest program, running on a universal Turing machine, which produces this set at the precision [varepsilon] in the sense of Hausdorff distance. This is the Kolmogorov complexity of the approximated Cantor set, which we call the '[varepsilon]-distortion complexity'. How does this quantity behave as [varepsilon] tends to 0? And, moreover, how this behaviour relates to other characteristics of the Cantor set? This is the subject of this work: we estimate this quantity for several types of Cantor sets on the line generated by iterated function systems and exhibit very different behaviours. For instance, the [varepsilon]-distortion complexity of most C super(k) Cantor sets is proven to behave as [varepsilon] super(-)Dkwhere D is its box counting dimension. | 
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23  | 
| ISSN: | 0951-7715 1361-6544  | 
| DOI: | 10.1088/0951-7715/24/2/005 |