A Short Screener Is Valid for Assessing Mediterranean Diet Adherence among Older Spanish Men and Women

Ensuring the accuracy of dietary assessment instruments is paramount for interpreting diet-disease relationships. The present study assessed the relative and construct validity of the 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) used in the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of nutrition Vol. 141; no. 6; pp. 1140 - 1145
Main Authors Schröder, Helmut, Fitó, Montserrat, Estruch, Ramón, Martínez-González, Miguel A., Corella, Dolores, Salas-Salvadó, Jordi, Lamuela-Raventós, Rosa, Ros, Emilio, Salaverría, Itziar, Fiol, Miquel, Lapetra, José, Vinyoles, Ernest, Gómez-Gracia, Enrique, Lahoz, Carlos, Serra-Majem, Lluis, Pintó, Xavier, Ruiz-Gutierrez, Valentina, Covas, María-Isabel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society for Nutrition 01.06.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-3166
1541-6100
1541-6100
DOI10.3945/jn.110.135566

Cover

More Information
Summary:Ensuring the accuracy of dietary assessment instruments is paramount for interpreting diet-disease relationships. The present study assessed the relative and construct validity of the 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) used in the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) study, a primary prevention nutrition-intervention trial. A validated FFQ and the MEDAS were administered to 7146 participants of the PREDIMED study. The MEDAS-derived PREDIMED score correlated significantly with the corresponding FFQ PREDIMED score (r = 0.52; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.51) and in the anticipated directions with the dietary intakes reported on the FFQ. Using Bland Altman's analysis, the average MEDAS Mediterranean diet score estimate was 105% of the FFQ PREDIMED score estimate. Limits of agreement ranged between 57 and 153%. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that a higher PREDIMED score related directly (P < 0.001) to HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and inversely (P < 0.038) to BMI, waist circumference, TG, the TG:HDL-C ratio, fasting glucose, and the cholesterol:HDL-C ratio. The 10-y estimated coronary artery disease risk decreased as the PREDIMED score increased (P < 0.001). The MEDAS is a valid instrument for rapid estimation of adherence to the Mediterranean diet and may be useful in clinical practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0022-3166
1541-6100
1541-6100
DOI:10.3945/jn.110.135566