Spite and preemptive retaliation after tournaments
•We experimentally analyze antisocial behavior after tournaments.•We demonstrate that the perception of a situation as competitive drives money burning in a subsequent stage.•We disentangle the motives of preemptive retaliation and spite by a self-binding device.•Contrary to previous studies, we fin...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of economic behavior & organization Vol. 158; pp. 328 - 336 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.02.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0167-2681 1879-1751 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.001 |
Cover
Summary: | •We experimentally analyze antisocial behavior after tournaments.•We demonstrate that the perception of a situation as competitive drives money burning in a subsequent stage.•We disentangle the motives of preemptive retaliation and spite by a self-binding device.•Contrary to previous studies, we find clear evidence for both motives.
We investigated money burning after tournaments. First, we show that substantial money burning was triggered if participants perceived a situation as competitive. Second, we investigated to which extent aggression between former contestants was motivated by preemptive retaliation or spite. To disentangle both motives, we introduced a credible and visible self-binding signal. Contrary to previous studies, we found that aggression against a defenceless subject played an important role. Preemptive retaliation proved to be another dominant motive. We conclude that voluntary self-binding signals may have the potential to mitigate but not eliminate antisocial behavior after a competition, because it seems to be driven by spite to a large extent. Our results help us to better understand and eventually mitigate destructive behavior in work environments. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-2681 1879-1751 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.001 |