An investigation of Newton-Sketch and subsampled Newton methods

Sketching, a dimensionality reduction technique, has received much attention in the statistics community. In this paper, we study sketching in the context of Newton's method for solving finite-sum optimization problems in which the number of variables and data points are both large. We study tw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOptimization methods & software Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 661 - 680
Main Authors Berahas, Albert S., Bollapragada, Raghu, Nocedal, Jorge
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Taylor & Francis 03.07.2020
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1055-6788
1029-4937
DOI10.1080/10556788.2020.1725751

Cover

More Information
Summary:Sketching, a dimensionality reduction technique, has received much attention in the statistics community. In this paper, we study sketching in the context of Newton's method for solving finite-sum optimization problems in which the number of variables and data points are both large. We study two forms of sketching that perform dimensionality reduction in data space: Hessian subsampling and randomized Hadamard transformations. Each has its own advantages, and their relative tradeoffs have not been investigated in the optimization literature. Our study focuses on practical versions of the two methods in which the resulting linear systems of equations are solved approximately, at every iteration, using an iterative solver. The advantages of using the conjugate gradient method vs. a stochastic gradient iteration are revealed through a set of numerical experiments, and a complexity analysis of the Hessian subsampling method is presented.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
USDOE
US Office of Naval Research (ONR)
National Science Foundation (NSF)
AC02-06CH11357; N00014-14-1-0313P00003; DMS-1620022
USDOD Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
ISSN:1055-6788
1029-4937
DOI:10.1080/10556788.2020.1725751