A comparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences

Chapters from college textbooks in diverse fields were compared with summaries constructed to convey the main points. A series of studies demonstrate consistent advantages for summaries. Summaries maintained their advantages at retention intervals of 20 minutes, 1 week, and 6 to 12 months. Summaries...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 121 - 134
Main Authors Reder, Lynne M., Anderson, John R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier B.V 01.01.1980
Academic Press
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-5371
0749-596X
DOI10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90122-X

Cover

More Information
Summary:Chapters from college textbooks in diverse fields were compared with summaries constructed to convey the main points. A series of studies demonstrate consistent advantages for summaries. Summaries maintained their advantages at retention intervals of 20 minutes, 1 week, and 6 to 12 months. Summaries were superior both for questions directly taken from the text and for inference questions that required the subject to combine facts that had been studied. A transfer task looked at ability to learn new, related material as a function of how the previous material was learned. Summaries yielded better transfer. Reaction time differences showed the same pattern as percentage correct. Summaries maintained their superiority even when the main points in the text were underlined.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0022-5371
0749-596X
DOI:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90122-X