Using the Implicit Association Test to Assess Risk Propensity Self-concept: Analysis of its Predictive Validity on a Risk-taking Behaviour in a Natural Setting

The present work analyses the predictive validity of measures provided by several available self‐report and indirect measurement instruments to assess risk propensity (RP) and proposes a measurement instrument using the Implicit Association Test: the IAT of Risk Propensity Self‐Concept (IAT‐RPSC), a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of personality Vol. 28; no. 5; pp. 459 - 471
Main Authors Horcajo, Javier, Rubio, Víctor J., Aguado, David, Hernández, José Manuel, Márquez, M. Oliva
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bognor Regis Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2014
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0890-2070
1099-0984
DOI10.1002/per.1925

Cover

More Information
Summary:The present work analyses the predictive validity of measures provided by several available self‐report and indirect measurement instruments to assess risk propensity (RP) and proposes a measurement instrument using the Implicit Association Test: the IAT of Risk Propensity Self‐Concept (IAT‐RPSC), an adaptation of the prior IAT‐RP of Dislich et al. Study 1 analysed the relationship between IAT‐RPSC scores and several RP self‐report measures. Participants' risk‐taking behaviour in a natural setting was also assessed, analyzing the predictive validity of the IAT‐RPSC scores on risk‐taking behaviour compared with the self‐report measures. Study 2 analysed the predictive validity of the IAT‐RPSC scores in comparison with other indirect measures. Results of these studies showed that the IAT‐RPSC scores exhibited good reliability and were positively correlated to several self‐report and indirect measures, providing evidence for convergent validity. Most importantly, the IAT‐RPSC scores predicted risk‐taking behaviour in a natural setting with real consequences above and beyond all other self‐report and indirect measures analysed. Copyright © 2013 European Association of Personality Psychology
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-FTB99R8J-6
istex:705AB74CE4A4F80BA7C015AE6D31AB5DCC2BB659
ArticleID:PER1925
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0890-2070
1099-0984
DOI:10.1002/per.1925