Filtering of a Ricker wavelet induced by anelastic seismic wave propagation and reflection

A varying Q factor with depth induces modifications of seismic wave features due to anelastic propagation but also reflections at the discontinuities. Standard signal analysis methods often neglect the reflection contribution when assessing Q values from seismic data. We have developed an analytical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of geophysics and engineering Vol. 17; no. 5; pp. 838 - 851
Main Authors Ker, Stephan, Le Gonidec, Yves
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Oxford University Press 01.10.2020
IOP Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1742-2132
1742-2140
DOI10.1093/jge/gxaa033

Cover

More Information
Summary:A varying Q factor with depth induces modifications of seismic wave features due to anelastic propagation but also reflections at the discontinuities. Standard signal analysis methods often neglect the reflection contribution when assessing Q values from seismic data. We have developed an analytical quantification of the cumulative effects of both the propagation and reflection contributions by considering Kjartansson's model and a seismic plane wave at normal incidence on a step-like discontinuity. We show that the cumulative effects are equivalent to a frequency filter characterised by a bandform and phase that both depend on the ratio between the elastic and anelastic contrasts. When considering this filter applied to a Ricker wavelet, we establish an analytical expression of the peak-frequency attribute as a function of propagation and reflection properties. We demonstrate that this seismic attribute depends on the anelastic contrast, which cannot be neglected when assessing Q factors: the error in Q estimate is not linearly dependent on the anelastic contrast and we establish an analytical expression for the case where this contrast is weak. An unexpected phenomenon for a step-like interface is an increase in the peak frequency that is observed when the anelastic and elastic contrasts have opposite signs, with a constraint on the anelastic propagation properties. This behaviour allows for assessment of the elastic and anelastic parameters.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1742-2132
1742-2140
DOI:10.1093/jge/gxaa033