On the Structural Stability of Values for Cooperative Games
It is generally assumed that any set of players can form a feasible coalition for classical cooperative games. But, in fact, some players may withdraw from the current game and form a union, if this makes them better paid than proposed. Based on the principle of coalition split, this paper presents...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Journal of optimization theory and applications Vol. 189; no. 3; pp. 873 - 888 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        New York
          Springer US
    
        01.06.2021
     Springer Nature B.V  | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0022-3239 1573-2878  | 
| DOI | 10.1007/s10957-021-01863-6 | 
Cover
| Summary: | It is generally assumed that any set of players can form a feasible coalition for classical cooperative games. But, in fact, some players may withdraw from the current game and form a union, if this makes them better paid than proposed. Based on the principle of coalition split, this paper presents an endogenous procedure of coalition formation by levels and bargaining for payoffs simultaneously, where the unions formed in the previous step continue to negotiate with others in the next step as “individuals,” looking for maximum share of surplus by organizing themselves as a partition. The structural stability of the induced payoff configuration is discussed, using two stability criteria of core notion for cooperative games and strong equilibrium notion for noncooperative games. | 
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14  | 
| ISSN: | 0022-3239 1573-2878  | 
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10957-021-01863-6 |