On the Structural Stability of Values for Cooperative Games

It is generally assumed that any set of players can form a feasible coalition for classical cooperative games. But, in fact, some players may withdraw from the current game and form a union, if this makes them better paid than proposed. Based on the principle of coalition split, this paper presents...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of optimization theory and applications Vol. 189; no. 3; pp. 873 - 888
Main Authors Li, Xianghui, Li, Yang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.06.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-3239
1573-2878
DOI10.1007/s10957-021-01863-6

Cover

More Information
Summary:It is generally assumed that any set of players can form a feasible coalition for classical cooperative games. But, in fact, some players may withdraw from the current game and form a union, if this makes them better paid than proposed. Based on the principle of coalition split, this paper presents an endogenous procedure of coalition formation by levels and bargaining for payoffs simultaneously, where the unions formed in the previous step continue to negotiate with others in the next step as “individuals,” looking for maximum share of surplus by organizing themselves as a partition. The structural stability of the induced payoff configuration is discussed, using two stability criteria of core notion for cooperative games and strong equilibrium notion for noncooperative games.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0022-3239
1573-2878
DOI:10.1007/s10957-021-01863-6