Fast Point Cloud Ground Segmentation Using Frequency Analysis and Linear Plane Estimation

Deploying fully autonomous vehicles requires a reliable and secure Advanced Driving Assistance System (ADAS) which, crucially, must also offer real-time performance. This study proposes fast ground segmentation for LiDAR point clouds, utilizing frequency analysis and plane estimation. The process co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE access Vol. 13; pp. 147729 - 147740
Main Authors Rotjanakarin, Warintorn, Kaewapichai, Watcharin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 2025
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3593664

Cover

More Information
Summary:Deploying fully autonomous vehicles requires a reliable and secure Advanced Driving Assistance System (ADAS) which, crucially, must also offer real-time performance. This study proposes fast ground segmentation for LiDAR point clouds, utilizing frequency analysis and plane estimation. The process consists of four main steps: data sampling, intensity filtering, height filtering, and ground plane estimation. Data sampling selects partial data based on the vehicle's LiDAR installation. Intensity filtering extracts points within the most frequent intensity range, while height filtering utilizes unimodal thresholding to extract points in the dominant frequent height range, and together these filtered points estimate the plane of the segmentation boundary. Our experimental results, utilizing the SemanticKITTI dataset, have collected sampling width ratios (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">R_{w} </tex-math></inline-formula>), standard deviation multipliers (K), and tolerance coefficients (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">\varDelta T </tex-math></inline-formula>), which were evaluated using ANOVA. The optimal parameter combination yielded 91% accuracy, 84% precision, 94% recall, and an F1 score of 89%, all taking 2.7 ms of processing time.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3593664