Text Network Analysis to Develop a Search Strategy for a Systematic Review

Setting the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) elements during a search strategy development stage for a systematic review (SR) defines a research question specifically. In contrast to traditional methods that rely on researcher discretion, we propose a text network analysis (T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied sciences Vol. 14; no. 19; p. 8909
Main Authors Leem, Subeen, Shin, Jieun, Kim, Jong-Yeup, Shim, Sung Ryul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI10.3390/app14198909

Cover

More Information
Summary:Setting the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) elements during a search strategy development stage for a systematic review (SR) defines a research question specifically. In contrast to traditional methods that rely on researcher discretion, we propose a text network analysis (TNA) method using the R language to set the correct basis for the PICO. First, we collected 80 related papers from the PubMed database using ‘Health Impact Assessment of arsenic exposure’ as an example topic. Next, we recorded the keywords of each paper into a dataframe and converted the dataframe into an edge list format to create a network. Finally, we confirmed the connectivity and frequency of each keyword through network visualization and the importance of keywords according to three metrics through centrality analysis. As a result, arsenic could be expected to have detrimental effects on the occurrence of heart- and blood-related diseases or on mothers. By setting important keywords as the PICO elements known through a TNA, the reliability of SRs is improved, and this methodology can be equally applied to various topics.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app14198909