Predicting the actual use of m-learning systems: a comparative approach using PLS-SEM and machine learning algorithms

Despite the plethora of m-learning acceptance studies, few have tackled the importance of examining the actual use of m-learning systems from the lenses of social influence, expectation-confirmation, and satisfaction. Additionally, most of the prior technology adoption literature tends to use the st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInteractive learning environments Vol. 31; no. 3; pp. 1214 - 1228
Main Authors Alshurideh, Muhammad, Al Kurdi, Barween, Salloum, Said A., Arpaci, Ibrahim, Al-Emran, Mostafa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 03.04.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1049-4820
1744-5191
DOI10.1080/10494820.2020.1826982

Cover

More Information
Summary:Despite the plethora of m-learning acceptance studies, few have tackled the importance of examining the actual use of m-learning systems from the lenses of social influence, expectation-confirmation, and satisfaction. Additionally, most of the prior technology adoption literature tends to use the structural equation modeling (SEM) technique in analyzing the structural models. To address these limitations, this study extends the technology acceptance model (TAM) with the expectation-confirmation model (ECM) and social influence to predict the actual use of m-learning systems. A comparative approach using the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and machine learning algorithms was employed to test the proposed model with data collected from 448 students. The results revealed that both techniques have successfully provided support to all the hypothesized relationships of the research model. More interesting, the J48 classifier has performed better than the other classifiers in predicting the dependent variable in most cases. The employment of a comparative analytical approach is believed to add a significant contribution to the information systems (IS) literature in general, and the m-learning domain in specific.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1049-4820
1744-5191
DOI:10.1080/10494820.2020.1826982