Intersectionality and belonging: Muslims in the census of British Asia

The British territories of greater Southeast Asia were administratively connected to London and Calcutta, and while local censuses show that these centres could exert some influence at the furthest peripheries of the Empire, a close analysis of the ways in which race and religion were approached in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Royal Asiatic Society Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 1 - 18
Main Author Formichi, Chiara
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1356-1863
2051-2066
1474-0591
DOI10.1017/S1356186321000651

Cover

More Information
Summary:The British territories of greater Southeast Asia were administratively connected to London and Calcutta, and while local censuses show that these centres could exert some influence at the furthest peripheries of the Empire, a close analysis of the ways in which race and religion were approached in the classification of colonial subjects in Southeast Asia shows peculiarities specific to the region. In this article I argue that the demographic and socio-political contexts of British Burma and Malaya (with references to Hong Kong) led to a framing of ‘race’ that challenged European ‘scientific’ definitions and embraced instead the interweaving of multiple aspects of an individual's identity, most prominently religion. This shift, potentially empowering as reflective of local understandings of belonging, and an improvement from the period's anthropometric framework, was to backfire, however. With the emergence of nationalism, majoritarian identities came to be homogenised in these ethno-religious intersectional communities, marginalising and excluding those who did not fit.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1356-1863
2051-2066
1474-0591
DOI:10.1017/S1356186321000651