'You'll see that everywhere': institutional isomorphism in secondary school subject departments

This paper asks why spatially separated school departments might exhibit, in different ways, very similar practices. Data from an ethnographic study of three secondary school geography departments in England are discussed through a concept of 'isomorphism' (homogenising forces), drawn from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSchool leadership & management Vol. 37; no. 1-2; pp. 61 - 79
Main Author Puttick, Steven
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 15.03.2017
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1363-2434
1364-2626
DOI10.1080/13632434.2017.1293633

Cover

More Information
Summary:This paper asks why spatially separated school departments might exhibit, in different ways, very similar practices. Data from an ethnographic study of three secondary school geography departments in England are discussed through a concept of 'isomorphism' (homogenising forces), drawn from neo-institutional theory. Similarities across these departments are analysed in terms of coercive isomorphism, including the strong regulatory role played by examination boards and Ofsted; mimetic isomorphism, in which similar approaches are adopted in response to situations of high uncertainty, based on spreading good practice; and normative isomorphism, including the implications of closely guarded educational routes, the professionalisation of teaching, and wider social trends including the increasing use of Google as a source of knowledge for lessons. It is argued that evidence of homogeneity across spatially separated departments raises interesting questions about teachers' practice, with implications for departmental and school leadership.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:1363-2434
1364-2626
DOI:10.1080/13632434.2017.1293633