The ostensive dimension through the lenses of two didactic approaches

The paper presents how two different theories—the APC-space and the ATD—can frame in a complementary way the semiotic (or ostensive) dimension of mathematical activity in the way they approach teaching and learning phenomena. The two perspectives coincide in the same subject: the importance given to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inZDM Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 179 - 188
Main Authors Arzarello, Ferdinando, Bosch, Marianna, Gascón, Josep, Sabena, Cristina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.05.2008
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1863-9690
1863-9704
DOI10.1007/s11858-008-0084-1

Cover

More Information
Summary:The paper presents how two different theories—the APC-space and the ATD—can frame in a complementary way the semiotic (or ostensive) dimension of mathematical activity in the way they approach teaching and learning phenomena. The two perspectives coincide in the same subject: the importance given to ostensive objects (gestures, discourses, written symbols, etc.) not only as signs but also as essential tools of mathematical practices. On the one hand, APC-space starts from a general semiotic analysis in terms of “semiotic bundles” that is to be integrated into a more specific epistemological analysis of mathematical activity. On the other hand, ATD proposes a general model of mathematical knowledge and practice in terms of “praxeologies” that has to include a more specific analysis of the role of ostensive objects in the development of mathematical activities in the classroom. The articulation of both theoretical perspectives is proposed as a contribution to the development of suitable frames for Networking Theories in mathematics education.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1863-9690
1863-9704
DOI:10.1007/s11858-008-0084-1