A cephalometric study on Le Fort Ⅲ osteotomy related anatomical features of anterior cranial base in syndromic craniosynostosis
This study aims to investigate the anatomical features relating to nasofrontal and septum osteotomy during Le Fort Ⅲ osteotomy among patients with syndromic craniosynostosis, and to compare them with normal controls using computed tomographic cephalometry. A total of 63 subjects were included (syndr...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery Vol. 52; no. 11; pp. 1406 - 1410 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Scotland
Elsevier Ltd
01.11.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1010-5182 1878-4119 1878-4119 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.02.005 |
Cover
Summary: | This study aims to investigate the anatomical features relating to nasofrontal and septum osteotomy during Le Fort Ⅲ osteotomy among patients with syndromic craniosynostosis, and to compare them with normal controls using computed tomographic cephalometry.
A total of 63 subjects were included (syndromic craniosynostosis, n = 21; controls, n = 42). The craniosynostosis subjects were subdivided into group A (craniosynostosis patients without history of previous surgery, n = 8) and group B (craniosynostosis patients with history of previous surgery, n = 13). Cephalometric measurements based on computed tomographic images were analyzed.
The angle between the refencing plane (HP) of the anterior cranial base and the most inferior point of the sphenoid sinus via Nasion (∠HP-N-ISS) was 23.85 ± 3.10°, 21.15 ± 4.64° and 28.32 ± 2.92° for group A, group B and the control group, respectively. The angle between HP and the posterior nasal spine (PNS) via nasion (∠HP- N- PNS) was 42.63 ± 2.02°, 38.50 ± 4.84° and 47.68 ± 2.62° for group A, group B and the control group, respectively.
This study characterized the surgically relevant anatomical features in nasofrontal osteotomy during Le Fort Ⅲ osteotomy. The safe range for osteotomy angle is significantly different between normal and syndromic craniosynostosis subjects. Awareness of this difference may prevent further complications. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1010-5182 1878-4119 1878-4119 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.02.005 |