An MRI‐Based Prognostic Stratification System for Medical Decision‐Making of Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Beyond the Milan Criteria
Background The suitability of hepatectomy among patients with multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (MHCC) beyond the Milan criteria remains controversial. There is a need for a reliable risk stratification tool among these patients for the selection of ideal candidates of curative resection. Purpos...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 58; no. 6; pp. 1918 - 1929 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.12.2023
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
DOI | 10.1002/jmri.28724 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
The suitability of hepatectomy among patients with multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (MHCC) beyond the Milan criteria remains controversial. There is a need for a reliable risk stratification tool among these patients for the selection of ideal candidates of curative resection.
Purpose
To determine the clinicoradiological prognostic factors for patients with MHCC beyond the Milan criteria to further develop a stratification system.
Study Type
Retrospective.
Subjects
176 patients with pathologically confirmed MHCC beyond the Milan criteria.
Field Strength/Sequence
The 1.5 T scanner, including T1‐, T2‐, diffusion‐weighted imaging, in/out‐phase imaging, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging.
Assessment
Conventional MRI features and preoperative laboratory data including aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and α‐fetoprotein (AFP) were collected and analyzed. Two nomograms incorporating clinicoradiological variables were independently constructed to predict recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) with Cox regression analyses and verified with 5‐fold cross validation. Based on the nomograms, two prognostic stratification systems for RFS and OS were further developed.
Statistical Tests
The Cohen's kappa/intraclass correlation coefficient, C‐index, calibration curve, Kaplan–Meier curve, log‐rank test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
AST > 40 U/L, increased tumor burden score, radiological liver cirrhosis and nonsmooth tumor margin were independent predictors for poor RFS, while AST > 40 U/L, AFP > 400 ng/mL and radiological liver cirrhosis were independent predictors for poor OS. The two nomograms demonstrated good discrimination performance with C‐index of 0.653 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.602–0.794) and 0.685 (95% CI, 0.623–0.747) for RFS and OS, respectively. The 5‐fold cross validation further validated the discrimination capability of the nomograms. Based on the nomogram models, MHCC patients beyond the Milan criteria were stratified into low−/medium−/high‐risk groups with significantly different RFS and OS.
Data Conclusion
The proposed MRI‐based prognostic stratification system facilitates the refinement and further subclassification of patients with MHCC beyond the Milan criteria.
Evidence Level
4.
Technical Efficacy
2. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Fei Wu, Xiaoyan Ni, and Haitao Sun contributed equally to this work. Grant support: This study has received funding by Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (grant number 202240152), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82171897), Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (grant number shslczdzk03202), Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (grant number SHDC2020CR1029B), China National Key R&D Program (grant number 2022YFC2401605), Scientific Research Development Plan of SHDC and UNITED IMAGING (grant number SKLY2022CRT201), “Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan” Star Cultivation (Sailing Program) (grant number 22YF1443600) and Youth Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (20204Y0346). ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.28724 |