The lip split: a retrospective outcomes study of central and lateral lip split access for head and neck reconstructive surgery

Purpose Surgical resection of oral cancers requires meticulous planning to achieve clear margins and minimize potential morbidity. This study aimed to compare postoperative surgical and functional outcomes following central and lateral lip-split approaches used for resection and reconstruction of or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOral and maxillofacial surgery Vol. 29; no. 1; p. 63
Main Authors Gearing, Peter, Devine, Maxim, Pang, Siyuan, Sim, Felix, Ramakrishnan, Anand
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 06.03.2025
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1865-1569
1865-1550
1865-1569
DOI10.1007/s10006-025-01355-1

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose Surgical resection of oral cancers requires meticulous planning to achieve clear margins and minimize potential morbidity. This study aimed to compare postoperative surgical and functional outcomes following central and lateral lip-split approaches used for resection and reconstruction of oral tumours. Methods A retrospective review of 79 cases involving lip-split procedures for head and neck cancers was conducted. Data were collected from a prospectively recorded database (December 2015 to December 2022). Statistical analyses compared patient demographics, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes between central and lateral lip-split cohorts. Results Lateral lip splits were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications ( p  = 0.008), including return to theatre ( p  = 0.015), and functional issues including asymmetric smile ( p  = 0.009). No significant differences were observed in readmission rates, length of stay, or time to oral diet commencement ( p  > 0.05). Conclusions Lip-split procedures remain valuable for resection and reconstruction of oral and oropharyngeal tumours. Lateral lip splits are associated with poorer outcomes when compared to central approaches. Appropriate selection of lip splitting approaches should consider tumour location, resection margins, patient comorbidities and preferences, and surgical preferences.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1865-1569
1865-1550
1865-1569
DOI:10.1007/s10006-025-01355-1