Fifth generation troponin T assay is subject to antibody interference

[Display omitted] •Spurious 5th generation troponin results may prompt unnecessary treatment or further diagnostic evaluation.•Fourth and 5th generation troponin T are not subject to the same heterophilic antibody interference.•Heterophilic antibody interference may be discerned utilizing antibody-b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinica chimica acta Vol. 505; pp. 98 - 99
Main Authors Hedley, Jeffrey, Menon, Venu, Cho, Leslie, McShane, Adam J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0009-8981
1873-3492
1873-3492
DOI10.1016/j.cca.2020.02.006

Cover

More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •Spurious 5th generation troponin results may prompt unnecessary treatment or further diagnostic evaluation.•Fourth and 5th generation troponin T are not subject to the same heterophilic antibody interference.•Heterophilic antibody interference may be discerned utilizing antibody-blocking and/or precipitating reagents. The fifth generation (high-sensitivity) troponin T assay offers increased precision and analytical sensitivity to the predecessor method. The assay has proven utility in risk stratification and patient management. Upon clinical suspicion and discordant 4th generation troponin T and troponin I results, we investigated a sample for suspected interfering substances to the 5th generation troponin T assay. The analysis included a serial dilution, treatment with polyethylene glycol, commercial antibody blocking reagents, and size exclusion chromatography. The sample diluted linearly (R2 = 0.9957); however, experienced a dramatic reduction in concentration after both the polyethylene glycol and blocking agent treatment. Finally, size exclusion chromatography demonstrated assay reactivity around 970 kDa range. These experiments elucidate a heterophilic antibody interference to the assay, and demonstrate potential measures to discern the interference.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0009-8981
1873-3492
1873-3492
DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2020.02.006